We Don't Win, You Don't Pay

Stockton California To Pay $6 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Wrongful Death Lawsuit Stockton, CA

City of Stockton, CA Set To Pay $6 Million To Settle Wrongful Death Lawsuit.

In October 2020, the tragic incident involving Shayne Sutherland in Stockton, California, brought to light severe concerns over the use of force by police, specifically techniques that can lead to asphyxia. The city of Stockton has recently agreed to a $6 million settlement with Sutherland’s family, acknowledging the wrongful death of the 29-year-old who died after being restrained face down by police officers during an arrest at a convenience store.

This case underscores a critical issue in law enforcement tactics that can result in unnecessary deaths and the legal and moral obligations police departments across the nation must consider. For individuals and families affected by similar cases, understanding your legal rights and the recourse available is paramount in seeking justice and accountability.

Case Overview

Shayne Sutherland, a 29-year-old resident of Stockton, encountered a fatal situation when police officers Ronald Zalunardo and John Afanasiev responded to a call at an AM/PM convenience store where Sutherland was reported acting erratically. The incident, captured on body-camera footage, shows Sutherland initially complying with the officers by sitting against a wall and answering questions. However, the situation escalated when Sutherland abruptly stood up, leading to the officers tackling and holding him face down on the ground.

The confrontation lasted approximately eight minutes, with Sutherland face down while handcuffed. Despite being restrained within the first 30 seconds, the officers did not reposition him to prevent positional asphyxia—a condition where the body’s position prevents adequate breathing. Tragically, Sutherland was pronounced dead following the incident, with the San Joaquin county medical examiner attributing his death to cardiac arrest exacerbated by methamphetamine intoxication but also noting positional asphyxia as a contributing factor.

In the lawsuit that followed, Sutherland’s family argued wrongful death, negligence, and excessive use of force. The settlement of $6 million, although a financial acknowledgment from the city of Stockton, brings little solace to the family who views it as a necessary step towards accountability and reformation in police practices. This case also brought to light legislative changes in California, specifically the AB490 law passed in 2021, which bans police from using maneuvers that put individuals at significant risk of positional asphyxia. 

Key Aspects Of The Case

1. Police Conduct and Use of Force: The central issue in this case revolves around the actions of the officers involved, particularly their decision to maintain Sutherland in a prone position even after he was secured. This method of restraint, known for its potential to cause positional asphyxia, is a significant point of contention. The body-cam footage was crucial in illustrating the sequence of events and the officers’ adherence to, or deviation from, appropriate procedures.

2. Impact of Substance Use: The presence of methamphetamine in Sutherland’s system was highlighted in the medical examiner’s report as a complicating factor in his cardiac arrest. However, the legal arguments focused less on Sutherland’s state and more on how the officers’ actions contributed to or failed to mitigate the risk of asphyxia, a key aspect underlining the wrongful death claim.

3. Legal and Financial Recourse: The $6 million settlement reflects not only the city’s acknowledgment of the mishandling of the situation but also the broader implications of such settlements in encouraging policy changes. Settlements in wrongful death cases involving law enforcement are often viewed both as compensation for the bereaved family and as a punitive measure intended to prompt institutional reform.

4. Legislative Responses: The incident catalyzed legislative action, with California’s AB490 law, enacted posthumously, outlawing police techniques that risk causing positional asphyxia. This legislative change signifies a direct response to such cases and aims to prevent future occurrences by setting clearer legal boundaries on police restraint techniques.

5. Public and Legal Scrutiny: The case has garnered significant public and legal scrutiny, serving as a critical reference point for discussions about police reform and the need for better training and adherence to safety protocols that prioritize life preservation over aggressive restraint methods.

Legal Challenges and Considerations

  • Proving Excessive Use of Force: A significant challenge in cases like Shayne Sutherland’s involves demonstrating that the use of force was excessive relative to the threat posed by the individual. This requires a detailed analysis of the force used, the threat level at the time, and the adherence to law enforcement protocols. The body-cam footage played a crucial role in this case, providing concrete evidence that the restraints used contributed to Sutherland’s death.
  • Distinguishing Between Cause of Death and Contributing Factors: The medical examiner’s report stated cardiac arrest exacerbated by methamphetamine use as the cause of death, with positional asphyxia listed as a contributing factor. Legally, this differentiation is crucial as it influences the arguments around liability and negligence, especially in distinguishing what was within the control of the officers versus inherent risks associated with the detainee’s health or actions.
  • Settlements versus Court Trials: Opting for a settlement, as seen in the Sutherland case, often reflects a strategic decision to avoid the uncertainties of a trial. While settlements provide immediate compensation and closure, they may not always guarantee a public admission of fault or lead to significant institutional change, a critical consideration for families seeking justice.
  • Legislative Impact on Future Cases: The introduction of laws like AB490, which bans certain restraint techniques, poses new legal challenges and considerations for law enforcement agencies. These laws not only set new standards but also create a basis for liability if the banned methods are used, impacting how future cases are evaluated and prosecuted.
  • Emotional and Psychological Factors in Legal Proceedings: Wrongful death cases, particularly those involving alleged police misconduct, are charged with emotional and psychological complexities that can affect all parties involved. The emotional weight of the incident on the jury, the family’s grief and public opinion, can all influence the proceedings and outcomes of such cases.

If you or someone you know has experienced a loss similar to that of Shayne Sutherland due to potentially excessive police force, it is crucial to understand your legal rights and options. Families facing these tragedies deserve justice and may require professional legal support to navigate the complexities of wrongful death claims.

What does wrongful death entail in cases involving police actions? Wrongful death in the context of police actions refers to a death that is caused by the negligent, reckless, or deliberate actions of police officers. Legal claims typically focus on whether the use of force was excessive and if it directly contributed to the death.

How can a family prove excessive force was used by police? Proving excessive force involves collecting and presenting evidence such as eyewitness accounts, body camera footage, expert testimony on police tactics, and medical reports that correlate the cause of death with the force used. Legal representation is crucial to effectively manage the presentation of such evidence.

What kind of compensation can be expected from a wrongful death lawsuit involving police?  Compensation might include medical and funeral expenses, loss of future earnings, pain and suffering of the deceased before death, and loss of companionship for the family members. Punitive damages may also be awarded in cases of egregious misconduct.

How does legislation like California’s AB490 impact wrongful death claims? Legislation like AB490, which restricts certain police restraint techniques, can strengthen wrongful death claims by establishing clearer standards of prohibited actions. This helps in arguing that the use of banned techniques constitutes negligence or misconduct.

Is it necessary to settle these cases out of court? While settlements can provide quicker resolutions and guaranteed compensation, they often do not include an admission of guilt. Going to trial can potentially yield more significant judgments and foster public acknowledgment of wrongdoing, but it also carries the risk of uncertainty in verdicts.

How long do families have to file a wrongful death lawsuit after an incident? The statute of limitations varies by state but generally ranges from one to three years from the date of death. It’s important to consult with a lawyer as soon as possible to ensure your case is filed within the legal timeframe.


Free Case Review

Visit Our Main Office

Don’t navigate the aftermath of a wrongful death case alone. Let the Scranton Law Firm stand by your side. With over 50 years of experience as personal injury lawyers, we’ve helped thousands recover from their losses. If you or a loved one are affected by a wrongful death due to negligence or premises liability don’t hesitate to reach out to us. Secure your rights and seek the justice you deserve. Call us now for a free consultation – The Scranton Law Firm, your trusted ally in these challenging times. Call 800-707-0707 now.