Logo SLF

Fighting for you is what we do

California Premises Liability

What you need to know:


What Is California Premises Liability Law?

California Premises Liability Law is a crucial aspect of personal injury law that focuses on accidents that occur on someone else’s property. 

In California, property owners and occupiers have a legal responsibility to ensure that their premises are reasonably safe for visitors. This duty of care applies to both public and private properties, including residential homes, commercial establishments, and government-owned buildings.

Under this law, they can be held liable for injuries sustained by visitors if they fail to uphold their duty of care, directly causing the accident and resulting damages. Common scenarios include slip and fall accidents, dog bites, and hazardous conditions. As an experienced personal injury lawyer, I can help guide victims through the legal process and ensure they receive the compensation they deserve.


Most common types of Premises Liabilities

What Is Duty Of Care Under California Premises Liability Law?

In the context of California Premises Liability Law, Duty of Care refers to the legal obligation property owners and occupiers have to ensure the safety of visitors on their premises. This responsibility applies to both public and private properties, encompassing residential homes, commercial establishments, and government-owned buildings.

To fulfill this duty, property owners and occupiers must take reasonable steps to maintain a safe environment, addressing any known hazards and mitigating potential risks. Examples of upholding the duty of care include regular inspections, promptly repairing damages, and providing adequate warnings for potential hazards.

If a property owner or occupier breaches this duty of care and an individual suffers injuries on their premises, the owner or occupier may be held liable for damages under California Premises Liability Law. This includes compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. It’s important to note that California follows a “comparative negligence” rule, so if the injured party is found to be partially at fault, their compensation may be reduced accordingly.

Tell Us About Your Case

What are the Key Components of a California Premises Liability Case?

Duty of Care

Duty of Care refers to the legal obligation property owners and occupiers have to maintain a reasonably safe environment for visitors on their premises, addressing known hazards and taking necessary precautions to prevent accidents and injuries. Failure to uphold this duty can result in liability for injuries sustained by visitors.


Breach of Duty

Breach of Duty occurs when a property owner or occupier fails to fulfill their legal obligation to maintain a safe environment, neglecting known hazards or not taking reasonable precautions. In a premises liability case, proving a breach of duty is essential to establish the property owner’s liability for a visitor’s injuries.



In premises liability cases, causation refers to establishing a direct link between the property owner or occupier’s breach of duty and the accident, proving that their negligence or failure to maintain a safe environment led to the visitor’s injuries. Demonstrating causation is crucial for a successful claim.



In premises liability cases, damages refer to the compensation sought by the injured party for losses resulting from the accident, such as medical expenses, lost wages, or pain and suffering. Proving damages is essential to secure fair compensation from the property owner or occupier held liable for the injuries.

What Is Actual Or Constructive Knowledge?

In premises liability claims, actual or constructive knowledge refers to a property owner or occupier’s awareness of a hazardous condition on their premises that could potentially cause harm to visitors.

Actual knowledge means the property owner or occupier is directly aware of the specific hazard, such as being informed about a spill or personally witnessing the dangerous condition. On the other hand, constructive knowledge implies that the property owner or occupier should have reasonably known about the hazard, even if they did not have direct knowledge of it. This can be established by proving that the dangerous condition existed for a sufficient length of time, making it likely that the owner or occupier would have discovered and addressed it through reasonable inspections and maintenance.

In premises liability cases, establishing either actual or constructive knowledge is crucial, as it helps demonstrate that the property owner or occupier breached their duty of care by failing to address the known hazard, leading to the visitor’s injuries.

Premises Liability - Slip & Fall China Buffet Case

What Factors Does The Court Consider In Premises Liability Negligence?

In determining if a property owner used reasonable care and committed premises liability negligence, courts may consider:

  1. Foreseeability of the hazard.
  2. Frequency of property inspections.
  3. Promptness of hazard removal or repair.
  4. Adequacy of warning signs.
  5. Compliance with safety regulations.

These factors help assess if the owner upheld their duty of care in maintaining a safe environment for visitors.


Find Out If You Have A Case.

For Free!

Who Can Be Sued In A Premises Liability Case?

If I Am Injured Due To Negligence Who Can Be Sued?

When injured on someone else’s property due to negligence, you may file a premises liability claim against the property owner or occupier responsible for maintaining the safety of the premises. This can include homeowners, landlords, tenants, or business operators, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. In some instances, multiple parties may share liability for your injuries, and your claim may involve suing more than one party. It’s essential to consult an experienced personal injury lawyer to help determine the appropriate defendants in your premises liability case, ensuring that you seek the compensation you deserve from those responsible for your injuries.


Attorney Advertisement: Do not rely on this advertisement in making any medical decision. Please call your physician before making any medical decision, including altering your use of any drug. This advertisement is not intended as a testimonial or endorsement, and does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter, either express or implied. Non-attorney spokesperson. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyers’ credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Court costs and expenses may be the responsibility of the client. Scranton Law Firm, 2450 Stanwell Drive. Concord, CA 94520 Attorneys are licensed in California,  and may affiliate with attorneys located in other states. Cases will not be accepted in states where attorney solicitation is prohibited.